The World Cup’s hydration breaks are lucrative. Are they worth frustrating fans?
Mandatory hydration breaks have drawn criticism en masse from soccer viewers—and some marketers.
Alyssa is a senior reporter for Marketing Brew who’s covered sports for three years, with a particular interest in brand investment in women’s sports. Prior to that, she wrote about podcast and audio advertising for Marketing Brew and Business Insider and was a data journalist for Morning Consult. She started her career covering crime and breaking news for the Boston Globe and the Virginian-Pilot.
Mandatory hydration breaks have drawn criticism en masse from soccer viewers—and some marketers.
Reddit’s creatives are encouraging advertisers to adopt a “listening first…talking second” approach to win over soccer fans.
Because Scotland’s Tartan Army was there for the World Cup, of course.
The network is throwing serious marketing might behind its World Cup rights, including a Miracle on Ice–themed ad and the hiring of “chief World Cup watchers.”
Earlier this year, Blueair became the official air-care partner of the New York Knicks, who went on to win the NBA championship. “I’m not saying it’s the air, but I’m not saying it’s not the air that’s helped them win,” the brand’s CMO said.
After a run, I always want ice cream,” one runner said. Another dreams of a cookie sponsorship. But snack-food brands are few and far between in running partnerships…so far.
The new commercial brand, Plyrs Untd, is “changing the partnership dynamic” to put more power in the hands of the athletes, one NBPA exec said.
The personal care giant is an official sponsor of the tournament with several pro athlete partners, but its World Cup push is largely centered around influencers.
The team rolled out an animated series on YouTube starring mascot KC Wolf, marking its first push into children’s content.
A report from Morning Consult found that legacy brands like Mr. Pibb and Marlboro gained the most trust this year.